George Mason Law Review
Volume 12 || Fall 2003 || Number 1
Contents
|
|
ARTICLES |
|
|
|
IMPROVING THE ECONOMIC FOUNDATIONS OF COMPETITION POLICY |
Timothy J. Muris |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WHY DID THE ANTITRUST AGENCIES EMBRACE UNILATERAL EFFECTS? |
Jonathan B. Baker |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MODERN INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION: A COMMENT |
Michelle M. Burtis |
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
THE RELEVANCE FOR ANTITRUST POLICY OF THEORETICAL AND EMPIRICAL ADVANCES IN INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION |
Dennis W. Carlton |
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COORDINATED INTERACTION: PRE-MERGER CONSTRAINTS AND POST-MERGER EFFECTS |
Andrew R. Dick |
65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COORDINATED INTERACTION AND CLAYTON § 7 ENFORCEMENT |
Stuart D. Gurrea Bruce M. Owen |
89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EXCLUSIVE DEALING AS COMPETITION FOR DISTRIBUTION “ON THE MERITS” |
Benjamin Klein |
119 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANTITRUST ECONOMICS—MAKING PROGRESS, AVOIDING REGRESSION |
Abbott B. Lipsky, Jr. |
163 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASENOTE |
|
|
|
JUST DO IT: KASKY V. NIKE, INC. ILLUSTRATES THAT IT IS TIME TO ABANDON THE COMMERCIAL SPEECH DOCTRINE |
William Warner Eldridge IV |
179 |

