ARTICLES

AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF SUPREME
COURT CERTIORARI PETITION
PROCEDURES: THE CALL FOR RESPONSE
AND THE CALL FOR THE VIEWS OF
THE SOLICITOR GENERAL

David C. Thompson and
  Melanie F. Wachtell

237 

PROSECUTORS AS PUNISHMENT
THEORISTS: SEEKING SENTENCING
JUSTICE

Michael A. Simons

303

THE NEW LACHES: CREATING TITLE
WHERE NONE EXISTED

Kathryn E. Fort

357

DEAD MEN REPRODUCING:
 RESPONDING TO THE EXISTENCE
 OF AFTERDEATH CHILDREN

Browne C. Lewis

403 

COMMENTS & CASENOTE

YOU’RE FIRED! BISHOP v. WOOD:
 WHEN DOES A LETTER IN A FORMER
 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE’S PERSONNEL FILE
 DENY A DUE PROCESS LIBERTY RIGHT?

Katherine Crytzer

447

DEFERENTIAL REVIEW FOR A NONFIDUCIARY’S
 DECISION?: HOW GEDDES v. UNITED
 STAFFING ALLIANCE SPLIT THE CIRCUITS,
 ERISA, AND A PLAN PARTICIPANT’S RIGHT
 TO DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

Ashlie Lawton

471

COMPETITION FOR STANDING: DEFINING
 THE COMMERCIAL PLAINTIFF UNDER
 SECTION 43(a) OF THE LANHAM ACT

Diane Taing

493