Current News

Mason Supreme Court Clinic Files Supreme Court Amicus Brief on Behalf of the National District Attorneys Association

On Friday, September 23, Mason’s new Supreme Court Clinic, led by Wiley Rein attorneys William Consovoy (’01) and Thomas McCarthy (’01), filed an amicus brief in the Supreme Court of the United States on behalf of the National District Attorneys Association (NDAA) in Perry v. New Hampshire, No. 10-8974.  Perry is a criminal case on direct appeal from the Supreme Court of New Hampshire presenting the question whether the due process protections against the admission of unreliable eyewitness identification evidence should be expanded to apply to eyewitness identification evidence not procured through improper state action. 

Clinic students Lora Barnhart Driscoll, Elizabeth Garvey, and Matthew McGuire assisted in drafting the NDAA’s amicus brief, which argues that unreliable eyewitness identification evidence does not implicate the Due Process Clause if it was not procured through improper state action. 

For more information, please contact Thomas McCarthy (tmccarthy@wileyrein.com) or William Consovoy (wconsovoy@wileyrein.com), the co-directors of the Supreme Court Clinic.

Read the brief