The Optimal Standard of Proof with Adjudication Avoidance
- Author(s): Murat Mungan
- Date Posted: 2018
- Law & Economics #: 18-47
- Availability: Full text (most recent) on SSRN
Actors, whether guilty or innocent, may invest in costly measures to reduce their likelihood of being audited. The value of these investments are increasing in the probability with which they expect to be found guilty conditional on being audited. Because strengthening the standard of proof reduces the probability of conviction, it also reduces the investments by actors to engage in costly investments to reduce their likelihood of being audited. Therefore, when balancing such avoidance costs and deterrence effects, it is optimal to employ a stronger standard than that which maximizes deterrence, namely stronger than preponderance of the evidence.